Legal Opinion

Sinawski v. Cuevas

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eugene R Wolin, J.

Petitioners have brought this proceeding for an order in the nature of mandamus directing the Clerk of the City of New York to certify as valid and transmit to the City Council of the City of New York (the City Council) an initiative for a proposed amendment to the New York City Charter.

Petitioners are the sponsors of an initiative which seeks to amend New York City Charter chapter 49 (§ 1100 et seq.). Chapter 49 is entitled "Officers and Employees” and its provisions relate to the duties of both elected and appointed officials and employees of the city,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of McCabe v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Dunham v. ArderySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Fossella v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Wallace v. TrippMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Groditsky v. PinckneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roth v. CuevasNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Marijuna Policy Project v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Schrader v. CuevasNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Roth v. CuevasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Sinawski v. CuevasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API