Legal Opinion
United States v. Green
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided February 24, 2010No. 09-0523/AFPublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review to determine whether Appellant’s counsel was ineffective, and whether the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) erred in not granting Appellant’s request for the victim’s (CM) mental health records. We hold that Appellant has failed to demonstrate prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Because Appellant has not demonstrated ineffective assistance of counsel, we need not reach the issue of whether the CCA erred in not obtaining CM’s records.
I
A panel of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. MazzaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- United States v. DatavsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. SaukUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. Private E1 JORDAN R. AXTELLArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
- United States v. WittUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.