Legal Opinion

Laycock v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1894No. 17,004PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Marion Criminal Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.

James H. Laycock, the appellant in this case, was the defendant in the criminal court of Marion county, charged with embezzling from “Hoosier Lodge, No. 261, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen,” the sum of two hundred and eighty-nine dollars and thirty cents in money, the property of said lodge, etc.

In the second count of the indictment, it is charged that the money alleged to have been embezzled belonged to one James F. Lee, but there is no claim made whatever on the second count of the indictment, and it is not before us for our consideration.

The first count of the indictment, omitting the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Epps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Lafond v. . DeemsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Nichols v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Manning v. GasharieIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Short v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Raines v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  3. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Rowe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ridge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API