Legal Opinion

Gaddis v. McCullough

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 2005No. 67A05-0409-CV-482PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Four unsuccessful candidates for town office in Cloverdale sought a recount and, when the recount did not change the election's outcome, sought judicial review to contest the results. The recount litigation originally contained multiple allegations of fraud, but by the time of trial the only remaining claim was that allowing three precinets to vote at one site and not separately tallying each precinct violated Indiana law. We affirm the trial court's Judgment that the unsuccessful candidates showed no basis for altering the outcome of the election because…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McIntosh v. Melroe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Pence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. PSI Energy, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Pabey v. PastrickIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. Riverside Community Corrections Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Clevenger v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Mansfield v. McSHURLEYIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Town of Dyer v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Karin Schwab v. Kyle MorrisseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API