Legal Opinion

Alberta Pork Producers' Marketing Board v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 22, 1988No. Court 85-09-01257PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DiCARLO, Judge:

Plaintiffs brought this action challenging the final affirmative subsidy determination by the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (Commerce) in Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination; Live Swine and Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Pork Products from Canada, 50 Fed.Reg. 25,-097 (June 17, 1985), and the final affirmative injury determination by the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) in Live Swine and Pork From Canada, Inv. No. 701-TA-224, USITC Pub. 1733 (1985). In an opinion on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of DentistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Alberta Pork Producers' Marketing Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. Negev Phosphates, Ltd. v. United States Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. Wieland Werke, AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  4. Granges Metallverken AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  5. Serampore Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. United States Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API