Commonwealth v. Guzman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY GANTMAN, J.:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from the order entered in the Lu-zerne County Court of Common Pleas, granting Appellee’s motion to suppress. After review, we hold the court erred when it suppressed the evidence at issue because: (1) the preliminary interaction between Appellee and Officer Wetzel was a mere encounter only; (2) Officer Wet-zel’s subsequent decision to conduct a frisk for weapons was justified under the circumstances; and (3) Officer Wetzel lawfully seized the drugs inside the SUV as contraband found in plain view. Accordingly, we reverse the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GuessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MaguireSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. MarchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. ForsytheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.