Legal Opinion
James Thoma v. Tamekia O'Neal
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 9, 2015No. 4D14-3459PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNER,-J.
Appellant, James Thoma, challenges the injunction entered against him for allegedly stalking the Victim. Thoma argues that the trial court erred in entering the injunction because (1) there was insufficient evidence of a course of conduct to support a finding of stalking, and (2) the conditions imposed by the trial court as part of the injunction were overly broad and thus unconstitutional as a restriction on Thoma’s freedom of speech. We affirm the trial court’s determination that there was sufficient evidence of a course of conduct to support a. finding of stalking. ■ We agree…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rowan v. United States Post Office DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Operation Rescue v. Women's Health CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. ElderSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pickett v. CopelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Joseph Lawrence O'Neill v. Sara Skye GoodwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- JOSHUA GIVENS v. WILLIAM HOLMESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- KEVIN J. MURPHY v. KANDE K. BLUBAUGHDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Scott v. BlumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.