Legal Opinion
Pickett v. Copeland
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 17, 2018No. 1D17–293PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJay, J.
Terrance J. Pickett appeals the trial court's Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Stalking. Although we disagree that Mr. Pickett was deprived of due process during the hearing, we agree with Mr. Pickett that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the issuance of the injunction against him. Consequently, we reverse.
Mr. Pickett claims that competent, substantial evidence did not support the trial court's imposition of the permanent injunction against stalking. A trial *1144court has broad discretion to grant an injunction, and we review an order imposing a permanent…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Phillip Turner v. DriverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Glik v. CunniffeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Richard Fields v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Fordyce v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Michael Paulson v. Sarah RankartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Joseph Klenk v. Jessica RansomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Billy J. Stone v. Teresa A. McMillianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- KEVIN J. MURPHY v. KANDE K. BLUBAUGHDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Robinson v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.