Scott v. Blum
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Judge.
Randy Scott challenges the order enjoining him from cyberstalking. He contends that the petitioner below, Frederic A. Blum, failed to provide evidence of the statutory elements required for entry of an injunction against cyberstalking. Mr. Scott also contends that the order is overly broad and impedes his First Amendment right to free.speech. We agree that Mr. Blum failed to meet his evidentiary burden and reverse. As a result, we do not reach the First Amendment issue.
Mr. Blum filed a petition for injunction for protection' against cyberstalk-ing. Mr. Blunr-is a process server…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevaldina v. R.K./FL Management, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Alkiviades A. David v. John TextorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Leach v. KerseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- James Thoma v. Tamekia O'NealDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Bacchus v. BacchusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ASHLEY ANN KRAPACS v. NISHA E. BACCHUSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- Benhalima v. IakovenkoFlorida Second District Court of Appeal · 2026