Gloster v. Sonic Automotive, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARGULIES, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Sean Gloster filed an employment-related lawsuit against his former employer, defendant Melody Toyota (Melody), Melody’s parent corporation, other employees, and a third party. Although Melody and its related defendants warned Gloster prior to his filing of the lawsuit they would insist on arbitration under his employment agreement, the defendants waited until a year after the complaint was filed before petitioning the trial court to compel arbitration, filing a motion for summary judgment along with the petition. The trial court denied both the motion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Cronus Investments, Inc. v. Concierge ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Hoover v. American Income Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Acquire II, Ltd. v. Colton Real Estate GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bower v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Oto, L. L.C. v. Kho, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Burkeen v. Skilled Healthcare Group CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Jenkins v. Dermatology Management, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Khalatian v. Prime Time ShuttleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.