Legal Opinion

In re Dubbs

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 3, 1935No. 3523PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 21 to 21, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to the conversion, of hydrocarbon oils under heat and pressure in the presence of ■hydrogenating gas.

It appears from the record that for the purpose of producing so-called light products, such as gasoline, from hydrocarbon oils, there are at least two processes; namely, the cracking process, and the hydrogenation process.

Counsel for appellant…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stamicarbon, N.V. v. Chemical Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Hoover Co. v. OomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  3. Stamicarbon, N.V. v. The Chemical Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API