Legal Opinion

Hoover Co. v. Ooms

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 14, 1946No. 8602PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR K. MILLER, Associate Justice.

The Hoover Company, assignee of Curtis C. Coons, sued under Section 4915, R.S. 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain a reissue patent. Claims 15, 16, 38 and 39 are copies or modified forms of the claims of Bergholm with respect to his patent, and were made for interference purposes.

Both Coons and Bergholm disclose an absorption type refrigerating system in which gas heat is used to create the chemical reaction of the solutions employed to cause the cooling effect. One of the principles of refrigeration of this type is that heat exchanges occur through the contact or.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  2. Lindley v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
  3. In re DubbsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  4. McIntyre v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
  5. Funk v. WhitelyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lighthall v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API