Legal Opinion

Kachel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 20, 2006No. 02-08262, 02-06416; A127115PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that affirmed insurer’s denial of claimant’s claim on the ground that claimant had not timely appealed from the denial and had not shown good cause for extending the time for filing a request for a hearing. ORS 656.319(1).1 On judicial review, claimant asserts that (1) the board erred in upholding the denial without first determining whether a new or omitted medical condition “claim” had even been filed and (2) substantial evidence and substantial reason do not support the board’s conclusion that claimant did not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Tri-Met, Inc. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Knapp v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Basmaci v. Stanley WorksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fryer v. UMIADistrict Court, D. Montana · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API