Legal Opinion

Augusta Motor Sales Co. v. King

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1925No. 15718PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The principal on a promissory note, against whom a judgment has been rendered in behalf of the payee in an action by the payee against both the principal and a surety, is not interested in sustaining a judgment therein rendered in behalf of the surety, and is therefore not a necessary party to a bill of exceptions brought by the *434payee, complaining of tlie judgment rendered in behalf of the surety. The bill of exceptions therefore will not be dismissed upon the ground that in omitting to make the principal a party it fails to make necessary parties. Civil Code (1010), § 6176; Pharr v. Eve,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Russell v. McCartySupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  3. Pharr v. EveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Evans v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daniel v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Butler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Billiter v. Ledbetter-Johnson Contractors Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Newman v. City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Dillingham v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API