Augusta Motor Sales Co. v. King
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. The principal on a promissory note, against whom a judgment has been rendered in behalf of the payee in an action by the payee against both the principal and a surety, is not interested in sustaining a judgment therein rendered in behalf of the surety, and is therefore not a necessary party to a bill of exceptions brought by the *434payee, complaining of tlie judgment rendered in behalf of the surety. The bill of exceptions therefore will not be dismissed upon the ground that in omitting to make the principal a party it fails to make necessary parties. Civil Code (1010), § 6176; Pharr v. Eve,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Russell v. McCartySupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Pharr v. EveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Evans v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daniel v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Butler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Billiter v. Ledbetter-Johnson Contractors Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Newman v. City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Dillingham v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936