Dillingham v. Cantrell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
“Where, in a suit against two codefendants, the verdict and judgment are adverse to the defendants, and one of them makes a motion for a new trial, which is overruled, the movant can except to the judgment overruling his motion, and bring the case to the [appellate] court without making the other defendant a party to the bill of exceptions.” Turner v. Newell, 129 Ga. 89 (58 S. E. 657); Ruffin v. Paris, 75 Ga. 653; Jordan v. Gaulden, 73 Ga. 191; Durrence v. Cowart, 160 Ga. 671 (2), 673 (129 S. E. 26). Moreover, although it is the rule that all persons interested in sustaining or reversing the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sibley v. American Exchange National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Turner v. NewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Francis v. Dickel & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Wooten & Co. v. NallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Ruffin v. ParisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.