Manning v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The Court of Appeals certified to this court the following question: “Section 192 of the Penal Code of 1910 reads as follows: ‘If any person who has been intrusted by another with any money, note, bill of exchange, bond, check, draft, order for the payment of money, cotton or other produce, or any other article or thing of value, for the purpose of applying the same for the use or benefit of the owner or person delivering it, shall fraudulently convert the same to his own use, he shall be punished by imprisonment and labor in the penitentiary for not less than one year nor longer than five…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Hagood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. EnoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- People v. RolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- United States v. KehoeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1973
- In re Adoption of the 2005 Revisions to the Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions—CriminalCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Manning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932