Legal Opinion

Gilliam v. Quinlan

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 25, 1985No. 84 Civ. 2151 (DNE)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

WHEREAS on March 14, 1984, plaintiff, then an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institute at Otisville, New York (“FCI”), commenced this action, pro se, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for damages and injunctive relief against five officials and employees of FCI; and

WHEREAS on March 27, 1984, the court referred the case to Magistrate Michael H. Dolinger, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, to make findings and recommendations with respect to the complaint; and

WHEREAS plaintiff in his complaint alleges that: (1) defendants on two occasions wrongfully denied plaintiff a…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. MeeseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Lee v. CarlsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. UNITE NATIONAL RETIREMENT FUND v. Ariela, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Deshmukh v. CookDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  5. Leger v. DessureaultDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API