Legal Opinion

The Rogday

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 8, 1920No. 16797PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by Charles Christensen and others against the steam vessel Rogday. On application to release vessel from seizure on attachment. Granted.' Also on motion for alias monition against vessel.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN FEEET, District Judge.

[1] This is an application to release from seizure and attachment in admiralty the above-named vessel, interposed by and on behalf of the Russian government, through its consular office at the port of San Francisco, by a suggestion, in proper form, setting forth that the attached vessel was at the time of seizure the property of the Russian government and engaged, in its public service, and that such seizure and detention is an interference with and detrimental to that service.

The application is accompanied by the certificate of the Secretary of State, certifying' to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The RosericDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1918
  2. The AdriaticCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sevilla v. ElizaldeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. The NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API