Legal Opinion

In Re Abruzzo

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 2000No. 19-11422PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIANE WEISS SIGMUND, Bankruptcy Judge.

On November 11, 1999 I entered an Order with an accompanying Memorandum Opinion (“Abruzzo I”) in connection with Debtor’s motion (the “Motion”) under 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) and Bankruptcy Rule 3012 to value the interest of her mortgagee S & S Family Partnership (“S & S”) in the estate’s interest in certain real property (the “Property”), a row home located at 2423 South Hicks Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in which Debtor resides. Because I found that the S & S’s mortgages could not be modified under § 1322(b)(2) in her Chapter 13 case, I concluded…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Associates Commercial Corp. v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  2. In Re American HomePatient, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2003
  3. Holcomb Health Care Services, LLC v. Quart Limited, LLC (In Re Holcomb Health Care Services, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
  4. In Re FreemanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
  5. HSBC Bank USA v. UAL Corp. (In Re UAL Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API