Commonwealth v. Tharp
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIGRO, Justice.
At issue in this appeal is whether the November 3, 1998 amendment to Article I, Section 6 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which essentially provides the Commonwealth with the same right to a trial by jury as the defendant, is constitutional. For the reasons discussed below, we find that the amendment is constitutional and therefore, affirm.
Appellants Michelle Sue Tharp and Douglas Bittinger allegedly starved Tharp’s seven year-old daughter to death, dumped the child’s body in a garbage bin, and reported her missing to the police. On June 30,1998, both Appellants were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. PuksarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- STANDER v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. TharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Hospital & Healthsystem Ass'n v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.