Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. States

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2007No. 44 WAP 2006PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice FITZGERALD.

In this case, we consider principles of double jeopardy in the context of a simultaneous jury/bench trial for multiple criminal offenses. In a relatively unusual procedure, the jury was charged with rendering a verdict on some of the charges, while the trial judge had the task of deciding another. We must determine whether a mistrial on some charges due to a *456hung jury, coupled with an acquittal in the bench trial, implicates double jeopardy protections such that a retrial cannot occur. We conclude that under the circumstances of this case, the prohibition against…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TalbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. RolanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. OrtegaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. BargerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API