Legal Opinion
Arthur Whitcomb, Inc. v. Town of Carroll
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 13, 1996No. 95-309PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This case concerns the extent to which the defendant, the Town of Carroll (town), may regulate the commercial *404excavation operation of' the plaintiff, Arthur Whitcomb, Inc. d/b/a Twin Mountain Sand & Gravel (Whitcomb). The town appeals the Superior Court’s {Lynn, J.) ruling that: (1) RSA chapter 155-E (1994) preempts the town’s zoning ordinances and site plan review regulations; (2) RSA 155-E:2, 111(a) exempts all but one parcel of Whitcomb’s property from the permit requirements of RSA chapter 155-E; and (3) RSA 155-E:2, 111(a) exempts Whitcomb’s blasting operation from the chapter’s permit…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Techt v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- In re WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. HermsdorfSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Appeal of Coastal Materials Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Raudonis v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- North Country Environmental Services, Inc. v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Eldertrust of Florida, Inc. v. Town of EpsomSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Blackthorne Group, Inc. v. Pines of Newmarket, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Casico, Inc. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Bio Energy, LLC v. Town of HopkintonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.