Legal Opinion
Piallat v. Replogle
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 28, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 87-Z-515PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WEINSHIENK, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants Replogle And Grossman’s Motion For Cost Bond and Plaintiff’s Objection To Defendants’ Motion For Cost Bond. The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendants *166move for an order requiring plaintiff, a citizen of Massachusetts, to post a bond of security for costs, citing Colo.Rev.Stat. § 13-16-102 (1983) and Radoshevich v. Central Bank of Colorado Springs, 117 F.R.D. 434 (D.Colo.1987).
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure make no provision for the posting of cost bonds, and this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glickman v. MesighSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Soo Hardwoods, Inc. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
- National Distillers Products Corp. v. HindechDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1950
- Radoshevich v. Central Bank of Colorado SpringsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartnett v. Catholic Health Initiatives Mountain RegionDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Johnson v. Standard Registrar and TransferDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023