Legal Opinion
National Distillers Products Corp. v. Hindech
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 20, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 3143PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOUS, District Judge.
The plaintiff is a nonresident and the defendant has made a motion that it *230be required to furnish a cost bond. No other ground therefor is asserted in the motion which, as stated in the argument and as appears inferentially from its face, is grounded on Sections 10 and 11, Chapter 43 of Colorado Statutes Annotated 1935. While the Conformity Act, Section 724, Title 28 U.S.C.A., was in force, the defendant’s motion would have been good. Cavicchi v. Mohawk Mfg. Co., D.C., S. D.N.Y., 27 F.Supp. 981; Green v. Me-Tex Supply Co., D.C.S.D.Tex., 29 F.Supp. 851; Silvas v. Arizona…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cavicchi v. Mohawk Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Edgar Gold & Silver Mining Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Silvas v. Arizona Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Payton v. M. Spiesberger & Son Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Sutro v. SimpsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hanley v. VolpeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
- Corcoran v. CorcoranCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Hartnett v. Catholic Health Initiatives Mountain RegionDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Larkin v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Piallat v. ReplogleDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1989