Legal Opinion

Dallmeyer v. Hermann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1969No. 196PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM D. JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a will construction suit in which the sole question is whether or not the rule in Shelley’s case is applicable.

The rule in Shelley’s case has been abolished in this state, Art. 1291a, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Rev.Civ.St. However, Sec. 3 thereof provides that the act does not apply to conveyances taking effect prior to January 1, 1964, and the will in question became effective and was probated before such date.

Prior to her death Matilda Hermann and Louis Hermann, Jr., were husband and wife. At Matilda Hermann’s death she was survived by her husband and four children…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Darragh v. BarmoreTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Hancock v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Hopkins v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Lacey v. FloydTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Crist v. MorganTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barker v. Rosenthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  2. Tindol v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Harrison v. San-Tex Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Echart v. E. G. Senter & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API