Legal Opinion

Crist v. Morgan

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1922No. 272-3502PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLENDON, P. J.

The purpose of this suit, while in form in trespass to try title, was to construe the will of Daniel Crist; the particular issue being whether the rule in Shelley’s Case applies to that portion of the will which devised real estate to the testator’s 11 living nieces and nephews. The trial court and Court of Civil Appeals held that the rule applied, and that the nieces and nephews took title in fee. 219 S. W. 276.

The testator, Daniel Crist, never had any children, and his wife predeceased him. At the time the will- was executed he had 11 living nieces and nephews, among whom was Stephen Crist,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hancock v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Simonton v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Ware v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  4. May v. RitchieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Seay v. CockrellTexas Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. LittleTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Robinson v. GlennTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Sybert v. SybertTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Davis v. First Nat. Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Gay v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API