Hastings Malting Co. v. Heller
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Dakota county, where the action (brought to recover possession of personal property, of the value of $476.10) was tried before Crosby,. J., a verdict rendered for plaintiff, and a motion for a new trial denied.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
On the 25th day of March, 1890, one Herman Husmann was adjudged an insolvent, in pursuance of a petition filed in the district court of Scott county on the 19th day of March; and one Theodore Weiland was thereafter duly appointed receiver of the property of the insolvent. Among other property, the receiver took possession of the chattels described in the complaint, to recover possession of which this action is brought. Thereafter, pursuant to an order of the court, the receiver sold and delivered the same to the defendant. On the 6th day of February, 1890, Husmann had executed a chattel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buchanan v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Daniels v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Daniels v. Bank of ZumbrotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Holcombe v. EhrmanntrautSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thompson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Fisher v. UtendorferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897