Holcombe v. Ehrmanntraut
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing anew trial after verdict of .$1,200 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
In May, 1889, one A. H. Miller, the insolvent mentioned in these proceedings, was engaged in keeping a restaurant in the city of St. Paul, and defendants Lindeke and Ehrmanntraut were creditors of his, also engaged in business in the same city. On the 22d day of that month the defendants procured of Miller a bill of sale and transfer of all his property except some accounts, including the lease of the building occupied by him and the good-will of his business, in satisfaction of their claims against him. The transfer was not in the ordinary course of business, since neither of them required…
2Cited by5 opinions
- In re Virginia Hardwood Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1905
- Thompson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Bardes v. First National Bank of HawardenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Hastings Malting Co. v. HellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Dow v. SutphinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891