Legal Opinion

Kimberlin v. Rutliff

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 26, 1933No. 13,323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

Error is assigned to the denial of an application for change of place of trial.

Briefly, defendant in error alleged plaintiff in error’s failure to perform the terms of a written contract, fully set out, by which the parties were to exchange real prop erties, that of defendant in error situate in Pueblo and that of plaintiff in error in Canon City, and prayed for damages in the sum of $1,999. Plaintiff in error made timely application for change of place- of trial to Fremont county, and showed by affidavit that service of process was in that county, and that at the time of service, as well as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lamar Alfalfa Milling Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. Peabody v. OlesonColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. People v. District Court of Fourth DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Maxwell-Chamberlain Motor Co. v. PiattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  5. Felger v. WalcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hardenburgh v. HardenburghMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Resolution Trust Corp. v. ParkerColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. E. F. Gobatti Engineering & MacHinery Corp. v. Oliver Well Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Hardenburgh v. HardenburghMontana Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API