Hardenburgh v. Hardenburgh
Montana Supreme Court
1Dissent
I dissent. I am of the opinion that the prior decisions of this court, State ex rel. Interstate Lumber Co. v. DistrictCourt, 54 Mont. 602, 172 P. 1030; State ex rel. Coburn v.District Court, 41 Mont. 84, 108 P. 144; State ex rel.Western Accident Indemnity Co. v. District Court, 55 Mont. 330,176 P. 613, and Silver v. Morin, 74 Mont. 398,240 P. 825, correctly interpret that portion of section 9096, Revised Codes, relating to venue now before us. That portion simply states: "Actions upon contracts may be tried in the county in which the contract was to be performed, * * *." As construed by this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Interstate Lumber Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- Lamar Alfalfa Milling Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- State ex rel. Coburn v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. Western Accident & Indemnity Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- Brewer v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.