Doe v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnson, J.:
Plaintiff, proceeding under the pseudonym John Doe, filed a declaratory judgment action against agents of the State, claiming that retroactive application of the 2011 amendments to the Kansas Offender Registration Act, K.S.A. 22-4901 et seq. (KORA), violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution (hereafter, Ex Post Facto Clause). The district court granted summary judgment in Doe’s favor, finding that while the legislature intended KORA to be a civil statutory scheme, the act was punitive in effect…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. Petersen-BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- Shaw v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- State v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. CharlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. StollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.