Legal Opinion

State v. Stoll

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 5, 2021No. 117081PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,081 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. AMY STOLL, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Substantial compliance with a statute requires compliance in respect to the essential matters necessary to assure every reasonable objective of the statute. Put another way, substantial compliance with a statute may be found where one complies with the spirit and intent of the law but not with the absolute letter. 2. Substantial compliance is not a defense to a charge for failure to register under the Kansas Offender Registration Act because relaxing the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. State v. Petersen-BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. Sierra Club v. MoserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. MiloSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. MolerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. StanekSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. State v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  5. City of Shawnee v. AdemSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API