Legal Opinion

Pierce v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1974No. 2-873A178PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sullivan, P.J.,

Appellant (Pierce) brings this direct appeal from a conviction of theft. Pierce attacks the conviction alleging the State’s failure to present sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. We agree with Pierce’s contention, and must therefore reverse.

The evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom, most favorable to appellee (State) and the trial court’s judgment, are as follows:

In July of 1970, Blanck Chevrolet of Brownsburg, Indiana, received a 1968 Ford Mustang in trade for a new automobile. The Mustang was promptly sent to Midwest Auto Auction, Inc., an Indianapolis-based…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Manlove v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Capps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Shank v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. GUNDER v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DeMichaeli & Associates v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Gaddie v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Anderson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Winston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Monroe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API