Monroe v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
— Defendant-appellant, Monroe, appeals from his conviction of theft,1 contending the evidence was insufficient to prove the offense charged since the State did not prove that he knowingly exerted unauthorized control.
We affirm.'
The evidence most favorable to the State is: On April 15, 1974, Lawrence Pierce of Marion County, Indiana, parked and locked his motorcycle in front of his apartment. The following morning when he returned to the location where *420he had parked his motorcycle, he discovered that it was missing. He immediately reported the theft to the police.
Approximately ten days later…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Linnemeier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Pierce v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Kappes v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Finch v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978