Anderson v. State

SHIELDS, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Napoleon Anderson appeals his conviction by court trial of Theft, IC 35-17-5-3 (Burns Code Ed.), preserving several issues for our review. Due to our resolution of this appeal, however, we only address Anderson’s contention the judgment is not supported by sufficient evidence.

We reverse.

When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court considers the evidence most favorable to the verdict, together with all reasonable inferences which may be drawn from that evidence. McCormick v. State, (1978) Ind.App., 382 N.E.2d 172. If there is substantial…