Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 31, 1995No. 1 CA-UB 94-0129PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
The Appellant, Phyllis Carlson, unwittingly as the result of an error made by the Arizona Department of Economic Security, received more food stamps than the amount to which she was entitled. She was ordered to restore the value of the overage. She appeals, claiming that the Department is equitably es-topped from requiring restitution. We disagree with Carlson, and we affirm the order for restitution.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts are undisputed. Carlson first applied for food stamps in February 1992 and was certified to receive them for a period of twelve…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Ruby Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- John Hampton and Dorothy Hampton v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, and Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Santiago v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Graham v. AsburyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Knori v. State ex rel. Department of Health, Office of MedicaidWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Waters-Haskins v. New Mexico Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- De Alfy Properties v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Rivera v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.