Legal Opinion

In Re Revocation of Revocable Trust of Fellman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1992No. 1877PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this proceeding to force a recalcitrant trustee to assist the settlors in terminating a revocable trust, the orphans’ court denied relief and directed the parties to submit to arbitration the issue of the competency of the settlors. After careful review and for the following reasons, we reverse.

*579Harold and Marie Fellman, husband and wife, having created a revocable trust, transferred their assets to co-trustees, consisting of themselves and their nephew, Sidney J. Fellman, for the benefit of the settlors during their lifetimes. Paragraph 7 of the trust agreement provided that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Parker v. Children's Hospital of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. In re the Arbitration between Aimcee Wholesale Corp. & Tomar Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DevineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Scalfaro v. RudloffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Fisher v. Phillip Morris, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. In Re Estate of DevineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. In Re Revocation of Revocable Trust of FellmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API