Interstate Iron & Steel Co. v. City of East Chicago
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Porter Circuit Court; H. H. Loring, Judge. Action by. the Interstate Steel and Iron Company against the city of East Chicago and others. From a judgment for the city on its cross-complaint, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
— Appellant sought to quiet its title to real estate against an easement for a public street. Appellee, city of East Chicago, filed a cross-complaint to quiet title to the easement. The Lake county council, the board of commissioners, and the Hammond, Whiting and East Chicago Railway Company are also appellees, and all answered except the railway company, which was defaulted. Trial by jury. Verdict for city *508of East Chicago on its cross-complaint and judgment quieting title to the easement. ^
1. Answers were general denial and several paragraphs of special answer. Much space is used in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Downend v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Baldwin v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- City of East Chicago v. Interstate Iron & Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hollywyle Assn., Inc. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Poznic v. Porter County Development Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Walmer v. Town of BremenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Ault v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.