City of East Chicago v. Interstate Iron & Steel Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Porter Circuit Court; A. D. Bartholomew, Special Judge. Action by the Interstate Iron and Steel Company against the City of East Chicago and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
1. Action by appellee, against appellants, to enjoin the taking of appellee’s land for a city street. Prom a judgment for appellee this appeal is prosecuted. It involves the question of the validity of a resolution, or ordinance, of the Board of Public "Works of the City of East Chicago, which invests this court with jurisdiction thereof. Subd. 1, §1392 Burns 1914, Acts 1907 p. 237; Taylor v. Patton (1903), 160 Ind. 4, 66 N. E. 91.
*352. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, because (1) o£ alleged defects in the transcript, and (2) because, as alleged, appellants have so failed-to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Patten v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Heinl v. City of Terre HauteIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Taylor v. PattonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Interstate Iron & Steel Co. v. City of East ChicagoIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- City of Greenfield v. Hancock County Rural Electric Membership Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974