Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1940No. 27,427PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTremain, J.

The appellants were plaintiffs below and filed this action for a writ of assessment of damages and the appointment of appraisers pursuant to the provisions of the eminent domain statutes. Sections 3-1701, et seq., Burns’ 1933, §§ 14061, et seq., Baldwin’s 1934. Appellees filed objections to the issuance of the writ, to which appellants replied. The cause was submitted to the court for trial upon a stipulation of the facts. Judgment was rendered against appellants that they take nothing by their complaint, and that the issuance of a writ of assessment be denied. Motion for a new trial was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haynes v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Ramstad v. CarrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Town of Marion v. SkillmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Rhodes v. Town of BrightwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hooper v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Columbia Realty Corporation v. HarrelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. McKernon v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Edrington v. Rush County Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Jackson v. BOARD OF COM'RS COUNTY OF MONROEIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. City of Flagstaff v. BabbittCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API