Legal Opinion

Russo v. Diethrich

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 29, 1980No. 1 CA-CIV 4642PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Judge.

The sole issue raised in this appeal of a medical malpractice case is whether the plaintiff knew or should have known of the alleged malpractice more than two years prior to filing his action so as to be barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

This tort action, based upon medical malpractice, was filed on November 7, 1975 by the plaintiffs, Philip J. Russo and Karen Russo, his wife, against defendants Edward B. Diethrich, M.D., Robert Payne, M.D., and Samuel A. Kinard, M.D. The malpractice alleged was that on August 2, 1972, the medical doctors comprising the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Landgraff v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Acton v. MorrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Walk v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Stanbury v. BacardiTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. DeBoer v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Ealy v. SheppeckNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API