People v. Spencer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, J.
On this appeal from the granting in part of a motion pursuant to section 995 of the Penal Code,1 the People contend that the trial court erred in holding that a bison is not a bovine animal within the meaning of subdivision 3 of section 487 of the Penal Code.
*565Section 487 provides in relevant part: “Grand theft is theft committed in any of the following cases: ... 3. When the property taken is . . . any bovine animal. . . .” Provisions of the Penal Code are “to be construed according to the fair import of their terms, with a view to effect its objects and to promote justice.”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Mandel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. BlissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Cleland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1990
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1988
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1987
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.