Legal Opinion

People v. Medina

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1972No. Crim. 9710PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of violation of two counts of section 11503 of the Health and Safety Code. Section 11503 makes it unlawful to offer to sell a narcotic and to deliver some substance in lieu of a narcotic.

The evidence adduced at the trial disclosed that defendant on two occasions sold five capsules, which he represented to be “mescaline,” to an undercover narcotics agent. Upon analysis none of these capsules contained a narcotic or a restricted dangerous drug. One of the criminologists who…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. WoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. AstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. PierreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. GondaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API