Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Arot

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2013No. 20120379Published

1ConcurrenceSandstrom, Justice

[¶ 15] Admittedly, this case deals with an issue apparently seldom confronted by the courts in this country — the disputed date of birth of an immigrant. Although there is some contrary authority, the majority relies on a single, rather recent decision of a federal trial court and a recent Minnesota Supreme Court opinion to resolve the issue by a pre-trial motion to dismiss with the issue to be decided by a judge’s finding by a preponderance of the evidence.

[¶ 16] I believe looking to the two recent non-North Dakota decisions is inappropriate because it is inconsistent with our longstanding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BeaverstallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Heick v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hinkel v. RacekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. BalloneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API