State v. Arot
North Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceSandstrom, Justice
[¶ 15] Admittedly, this case deals with an issue apparently seldom confronted by the courts in this country — the disputed date of birth of an immigrant. Although there is some contrary authority, the majority relies on a single, rather recent decision of a federal trial court and a recent Minnesota Supreme Court opinion to resolve the issue by a pre-trial motion to dismiss with the issue to be decided by a judge’s finding by a preponderance of the evidence.
[¶ 16] I believe looking to the two recent non-North Dakota decisions is inappropriate because it is inconsistent with our longstanding…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BeaverstallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Heick v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Hinkel v. RacekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BalloneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.