Heick v. Erickson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Chad Heick appealed from a district court order denying his motion for a writ of certiorari, claiming the court exceeded its jurisdiction in finding probable cause to bind him over for trial on a charge of gross sexual imposition. We hold the trial court did not exceed its jurisdiction, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On June 21, 2000, Heick was living with his fiancee and her younger sister, the eleven-year-old victim in this case. Heick told an investigating officer that in the early morning hours of that day he masturbated in the same room that the victim was sleeping on a sofa…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baker v. LenhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Dreyer v. BrekkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Fargo v. Annexation Review Commission of Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. SerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Kostelecky v. EngelterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Winter v. SolheimNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ArotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. ArotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HowardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021