Legal Opinion

Carnell v. Halpin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1909No. Docket No. 78PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Frank B. Oarnell against Joseph J. Halpin for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case was begun to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff December 16, 1904, by a fall caused by the breaking of part of a scaffold on which he was working for the defendant in the construction of storm windows in a church at Sandwich, Ontario. The plaintiff and the defendant are both residents of Detroit, where the latter is engaged in the manufacture of stained and other glass windows, and in setting them. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of defendant. The case is brought here by writ of error.

The plaintiff is a lead glazier, and had been engaged in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morton v. Detroit, Bay City & Alpena RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Crane v. HardyMichigan Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Brown v. GilchristMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Lafayette Bridge Co. v. OlsenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  5. McDonald v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Risku v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Bittner v. Howie Roofing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Tautengan v. ZollerMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API