Legal Opinion
Healey (nee) Palmer v. Mary Jane M. Elliot, P.C.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 27, 2021No. 2:20-cv-13209Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TIANA HEALEY (nee) PALMER, Plaintiff, Case No. 20-13209 vs. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH MARY JANE M. ELLIOT, P.C., et al. Defendants. ___________________________________/ OPINION & ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY (Dkt. 27) AND MOTION TO AMEND (Dkt. 24) Plaintiff Tiana Healey has filed two motions. The first is a motion for leave to amend the complaint (Dkt. 24). The second is a motion (Dkt. 27) to take some limited discovery necessary to respond adequately to Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration (Dkt.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Riverview Health Institute LLC v. Medical Mutual of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Great Earth Companies, Inc., and Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Richard Simons and Kimberly SimonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Merritt v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Kutluca v. PQ New York Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.