Legal Opinion

Marshall v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 1974No. 72-5881PublishedCited by 284 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

We granted certiorari to consider petitioner’s claim that the provisions of Title II of the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act of 1966, 18 U. S. C. §§ 4251-4255, deny due process and equal protection by excluding from discretionary rehabilitative commitment, in lieu of penal incarceration, addicts with two or more prior felony convictions. The Circuits are in apparent conflict on this question. See the opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case, sub nom. Marshall v. Parker, 470 F. 2d 34 (CA9), and Watson v. United States, 141 U. S. App. D. C. 335, 439 F. 2d 442 (1970); United States v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by284 opinions

  1. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  4. New York City Transit Authority v. BeazerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Gonzales v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

279 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API