Legal Opinion
Hubble v. BI-STATE DEV. ILLINOIS-MISSOURI
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 6, 2009No. 5-07-0661PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 Ill. 2d R. 308). The defendant, Bi-State Development Agency of the Illinois-Missouri Metropolitan District, doing business as Metro or Bi-State, also known as Bi-State Development Agency (Bi-State), filed a motion to dismiss the complaint filed by the plaintiff, Brian T. Hubble. The circuit court denied Bi-State’s motion to dismiss and then certified the following question of law for our review: “Whether Bi-State Development Agency is a local public entity as defined by the Local Governmental and Governmental…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Solich v. George & Anna Portes Cancer Prevention Center of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Gillen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- CSAHA/UHHS-Canton, Inc. v. Aultman Health Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hubble v. BI-STATE DEV. ILLINOIS-MISSOURIAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Hubble v. Bi-State Development Agency of the Illinois-Missouri Metropolitan DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2010