Legal Opinion

Hubble v. BI-STATE DEV. ILLINOIS-MISSOURI

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 6, 2009No. 5-07-0661Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

915 N.E.2d 64 (2009)

Brian T. HUBBLE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF the ILLINOIS-MISSOURI METROPOLITAN DISTRICT, d/b/a Metro and Bi-State, a/k/a Bi-State Development Agency, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 5-07-0661.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District.

August 6, 2009.

Rehearing Denied September 11, 2009.

Donald L. O'Keefe, Rabbitt, Pitzer & Snodgrass, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Bruce N. Cook, Cook, Ysursa, Bartholomew, Brauer & Shevlin, Ltd., Belleville, IL, for Appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · StewartJustice Stewart

This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 Ill.2d R. 308).…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. People v. SharpeIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Solich v. George & Anna Portes Cancer Prevention Center of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API